technical writing view. Did you take English 101 in college? Your paragraph structure or lack of it makes no sense with no proper order.
You have one paragraph to describe A MAP system and another Paragraph to decribe a MAF. Following those two paragraphs you put the following immediatly:"Hands down MAF wins. The only way a map sensor could be AS accurate at this point is if you did not estimate, but knew EXACTLY what the average "weight" (read: pressure) was in the room." Which leads readers to falsely conclude from the preceeding two paragraphs that "MAF wins" and "MAP" is not accurate. Then you continue with the pros and cons of the two systems. Hence, you go back and forth and out of order on describing the MAP and MAF systems. I included a copy below so others can read it and you can too. What do I know I am douch bag. Oh well
MAF Sensor:
When going to the theater, picture yourself as making people pay at the door and as they enter, you count the number of people who come in. You then have a very accurate measure of people who come into the theater (i.e. incoming air measurement).
MAP Sensor:
Now when going to the theater, picture yourself making people pay at the door but NOT counting the people as they come in. Instead, you have the entire seating area resting on a giant scale. You also figure the average weight of the person attending the program and divide the total weight by the average weight for a count of the people attending the program that night (i.e. measuring air in the system by estimated "weight" in the room). Hands down MAF wins. The only way a map sensor could be AS accurate at this point is if you did not estimate, but knew EXACTLY what the average "weight" (read: pressure) was in the room. Now comes the trade-off. What if during the program, some people got pissed off and left the show out the side (air escaping via a blow-off valve). The MAF way of doing things would still think it had x number of members and would keep on going as if nothing occured (rich condition). The MAP way would recognize that drop in "weight" and would know that some people got up and left. What this really shows is that either system is good, but neither system is perfect. If anyone actually reads all of this post, I would be happy to give some follow-up to any question.
|
